Evaluating Sociological Perspectives on Crime and Deviance

A template I use to get students to evaluate the various perspectives on crime and deviance – it should work well for consensus theories such as Functionalism and Conflict Theories such as Marxism, but might be more difficult to complete for later postmodern theories… 

Types of Crime to consider

  • Serious Violent Crime, Terrorism, Anti-Social Behaviour

  • Burglary, Theft, Fraud, Drug possession

  • Hidden crimes: DV, elite crimes

  • Global crimes: cybercrime/ state crime/ green crime

Evidence to consider

  • Official Stats: Police Recorded Crime / CSEW

  • Specific sociological research studies – e.g. Venkatesh.

  • Any case studies

1

Supporting Evidence: Crimes this theory can explain

Is there any statistical evidence or case study* evidence which supports this theory?

2

Criticising evidence: Crimes this theory cannot explain

Is there any statistical evidence or case study evidence which criticises this theory?

3

Evaluate using other perspectives

What does the theory under investigation ignore?

  • Consensus theories

  • Marxism

  • Feminism

  • Interactionism

  • Postmodernism

  • Realist Criminology

4

Historical evaluation

Has society changed so much that the theory is just no longer relevant?

5

Evaluate in terms of ideology/ power

Is the theory biased, does it serve the powerful?

Out of 10 – How Useful is ___________________ Theory in helping us understand crime and deviance in contemporary society?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Pot Luck. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s