Last Updated on August 27, 2016 by
A template I use to get students to evaluate the various perspectives on crime and deviance – it should work well for consensus theories such as Functionalism and Conflict Theories such as Marxism, but might be more difficult to complete for later postmodern theories…
|
Types of Crime to consider
|
Evidence to consider
|
|
1 |
Supporting Evidence: Crimes this theory can explain Is there any statistical evidence or case study* evidence which supports this theory? |
|
|
2 |
Criticising evidence: Crimes this theory cannot explain Is there any statistical evidence or case study evidence which criticises this theory? |
|
|
3 |
Evaluate using other perspectives What does the theory under investigation ignore?
|
|
|
4 |
Historical evaluation Has society changed so much that the theory is just no longer relevant? |
|
|
5 |
Evaluate in terms of ideology/ power Is the theory biased, does it serve the powerful? |
|
Out of 10 – How Useful is ___________________ Theory in helping us understand crime and deviance in contemporary society? |
|
