Emile Durkheim’s Perspective on Religion

Last Updated on October 9, 2025 by Karl Thompson

In the Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912) Durkheim argued that all societies divide the world into two basic categories: the sacred and the profane:

  • The profane refers to mundane ordinary life: our daily routine/ grind of getting up in the morning, doing our ablutions, going to college, eating our daily Nachos, and doing the dishes.
  • The sacred refers to anything which transcends the humdrum of everyday life: which typically take the form of collective representations which are set apart from society (spiritual places such as churches or mosques are the most obvious examples of ‘sacred’ spaces.)

For Durkheim, Religion is the collective practice of marking off and maintaining distance between the sacred and the profane. This is typically done through rituals, such as those associated with the daily or weekly visit to the church or mosque. Prayer is an obvious example of an ‘occasional (sacred) ritual’ is marked out from ordinary mundane (or profane) life.

Two modern examples of sacred rituals include:

  • The shared mourning rituals following events like Queen Elizabeth II’s death in 2022 or national tragedies — illustrate how secular rituals can still be “sacred”.
  • Modern digital ‘totems’ such as brand logos or sports club crests (e.g., Manchester United badge, Apple logo) can be used to explain Durkheim’s point that “anything can be sacred”.

Durkheim’s Definition of Religion

Durkheim religion.png

Importantly for Durkheim, anything can be sacred (or rather, a society can determine that anything is sacred): there is nothing in any object or action that makes it inherently sacred: anything can be sacred: not only churches, mosques, and religious books, but in some cultures, trees, or even rocks may be regarded as sacred.

Durkheim believed that in order to understand the role of religion in society, the relationship between sacred symbols and what they represent must be discovered.

Totemism

Durkheim saw Totemism as one of the earliest and simplest form of religious practice. It is most commonly found among aboriginal peoples, such as the Australian aborigines, and North West Native American Indians, who have clan based societies.

Durkheim Totemism

Durkheim used the totemic religion of Australian aborigines to develop his theory of religion. Aboriginal society was divided into a number of clans, and members of the clan had certain obligations that had to be fulfilled – such as mourning the death of other clan members or helping seek vengeance if another member was wronged by someone external to the clan. Each clan was also exogenous – people had to marry someone outside of the clan.

Each clan had a totem, typically an animal or a plant which was represented by drawings or carvings made on wood or stone, typically linked to a ‘creation myth’ that explained the origins of that clan and linked current members into that history. The totem served to distinguish the clan from all other clans.

To clan members, the totem was as sacred object, nothing less than ‘the outward and visible form of the totemic principle or god’ – their animal/ plant was sacred and the totemic representation just as sacred if not more so.

Durkheim’s ‘big idea’ is that by worshipping the totem, clan members are actually worshipping society, and thus individuals are reminded that society is more important than the individual, which is essential in Functionalist theory because individuals are dependent on society.

The reason why humankind needs a totem to worship rather than just literally worshipping society (or the clan in the case of Aborigines) is because the clan is too complex a thing for people to conceptualise – religious symbols are just much simpler entities to worship!

Religion and the Collective Conscience

The collective conscience is society’s shared values and beliefs. One of religion’s most important functions is to reinforce the collective conscience. Society cannot exist without it, according to Durkheim.

Because the worshipping of religion is also the worshipping of society, religion imbues society with a sacred quality. This means it it has greater power to influence social action and create social solidarity.

When people come together in religious rituals they are reinforcing their social bonds. Through worship, they express their faith in their common values.

Through worshipping religion people recognise their duties to the social group and their dependence on society.

Religious rituals are especially powerful social bonding mechanisms in traditional societies. In such societies, ancestors are often the focus of worship. The collective conscience thus exists in the souls of ancestors, and thus religious ceremonies reinforce the idea of the collective conscience existing within the individual.

Durkheim in context

Durkheim is one of three Functionalist theorists of religion along with Malinowski and Parsons. Most of the general criticisms of the functionalist theory of religion can be applied here.

FunctionalistMain IdeaExample / Focus
Durkheim (1912)Religion creates social solidarity through shared symbols (sacred/profane distinction).Totemism among Aboriginal clans.
Malinowski (1954)Religion helps people cope with life crises and uncertainty.Trobriand islanders and ocean fishing rituals.
Parsons (1967)Religion provides moral guidelines and social stability in modern societies.Christian ethics and Western legal systems.

Evaluation of Durkheim’s theory of religion

There is some contemporary evidence which shows the ongoing relevance of Durkheim’s idea on religion:

  • According to the British Social Attitudes Survey 2023, only 38% of adults in Britain now identify with any religion — yet 80% still say they take part in “shared moral or cultural rituals” (e.g., Remembrance Sunday, charity events, football fandom).
    Supports Durkheim’s view that collective rituals maintain cohesion even when formal religion declines. Source: NatCen, 2023
  • ONS 2021 Census: Christianity dropped below 50% for the first time in England and Wales, but interest in “spiritual wellbeing” and collective events has grown. Source: ONS, 2022

There are several criticisms of Durkheim:

  1. The sample of Aboriginal groups Durkheim used may be unrepresentative of all Aboriginal groups. Thus it may not be possible to generalise his theory to all traditional societies.
  2. Durkheim’s theory may be relevant to small scale societies where integration is tight. It is much less relevant to more complex industrial societies.
  3. There are many examples where religious beliefs are opposed to mainstream societies. This is the case with many World Rejecting New Religious Movements, for example.
  4. Postmodernist view: Religion no longer unites society because of individualism and global diversity.
  5. Feminist view: Durkheim ignores the patriarchal structures reinforced by religious rituals.
  6. Marxist view: Religion maintains class inequalities rather than collective solidarity.

Despite these criticisms there are many examples today of where religion can promote social solidarity. The symbolic importance of the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem for Jews is an example of this.

Sources used to write this post

Beliefs in society revision bundle for sale

If you like this sort of thing then you might like my ‘beliefs in society’ revision bundle.

Beliefs in society revision bundle

The bundle contains the following:

  • Eight mind maps covering the sociological perspectives on beliefs in society. In colour!
  • 52 Pages of revision notes covering the entire AQA ‘beliefs in society’ specification: from perspectives on religion, organisations, class, gender ethnicity and age and secularisation, globalisation and fundamentalism.
  • Three 10 mark ‘outline and explain’ practice exam  questions and model answers
  • Three 10 mark ‘analyse using the item’ 10 practice exam questions and answers
  • Three 30 mark essay questions and extended essay plans.

The content focuses on the AQA A-level sociology specification. All at a bargain price of just £4.99!

I’ve taught A-level sociology for 16 years and have been an AQA examiner for 10 of those, so I know what I’m talking about, and if you purchase from me you’re avoiding all those horrible corporations that own the major A-level text books and supporting a fully fledged free-range human being, NOT a global corporate publishing company.

Signposting and Related Posts

This material is mainly relevant to students opting for the beliefs in society module as part of second year A-level Sociology.

To return to the homepage – revisesociology.com

What did Durkheim argue about religion?

Durkheim argued that religion unites people through shared beliefs and rituals that distinguish the sacred from the profane, reinforcing the collective conscience.

What is the difference between sacred and profane?

The sacred refers to things set apart and worthy of reverence; the profane refers to ordinary, everyday life.

How is Durkheim’s theory relevant today?

Even in secular societies, collective rituals—like sports, political rallies or online fandoms—still function in the same way religion once did.

What is the function of religion in Durkheim’s theory?

Religion functions to create social solidarity and bind individuals into a moral community.

1 thought on “Emile Durkheim’s Perspective on Religion”

  1. your language is quiet too sociological, can you use a bit easy language so that it would be easier to understand.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from ReviseSociology

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading