Social democracy is the main ideological perspective to the left of the Middle Way. In Britain, it has traditionally been associated with the Fabian tradition and the Labour Party, although it overlaps with some of the ideas held today by Liberal Democrats as well as the Third Way.
The Welfare State is a fundamental part of the ideology of social democracy.
Social Democracy vs. Democratic Socialism
Consequently, there is debate about the extent to which the social democratic perspective can (or should) be separated from democratic socialism, the term used by George and Wilding (1994). For instance, it can be distinguished on the grounds that democratic socialism implies a commitment to radical socialist change, albeit achieved by democratic means, whereas social democracy implies support for existing democratic structures but the use of these to pursue policies that are more interventionist and socially responsible.
However, such a distinction is not consistently borne out in practice; and, even if there might be potential theoretical disagreement between the two perspectives over ends, there is substantial theoretical consensus across them over means.
Core Principles of Social Democracy
The commitment of social democracy is to social justice through the gradual reform of the economic capitalist market economy. At the core rests an identification of social inequalities, whether economic or material, which are removed through gradual social change and reform, rather than through revolution.
This relies upon the existing structures of society to support, sustain, or ameliorate these problems and create a fairer system. Each proposal for such reform is based upon moral principles of collectivism and altruism: the pursuit of mutual support. These principles have also often been linked to Christian values of care and concern for one’s fellow man or woman.
Social Democracy in Post-War Britain
The pursuit of social democratic values is found within the practical politics of post-war Britain, often captured in the industrial muscle of the trade union movement. Through the electoral success of the Labour Party (formed by the trade unions in 1906), political success policies sought to force capitalist holders of wealth and other forms of privilege to redistribute resources, under the implicit threat of collective and revolutionary or disruptive social change.
Such redistribution of resources aimed to ameliorate the problems generated by capitalism, found within a broader pursuit of social justice.
The Strategy of Equality: Tawney’s Influence on Social Democracy
Perhaps the earliest theoretical exposition of this major theme of social justice can be found in Tawney’s (1931) discussion of the strategy of equality. He argued that social justice could, and should, be pursued within a capitalist economy through the introduction of universal welfare services and redistributive tax and benefit policies.
Fifteen years later, the post-war welfare state reforms could be seen as an attempt by the Labour government under Attlee to engage directly in such a strategy. However, subsequent criticisms of these achievements of state welfare—particularly regarding securing greater equality in practice—cast doubt upon the viability of such a strategy (Le Grand, 1982).
The Role of the State in Social Democracy
During the early post-war years, Fabian politicians and academics such as Crosland (1956) wrote about the desirability of a mixed economy and continued to argue against revolutionary solutions. The transfer of power and resources to the lower classes and the state had resulted in an irreversible transformation of the social and economic structure and had fundamentally altered the character of the social and economic model within capitalist countries.
The Impact of Neoliberalism and Welfare Reforms
Large parts of this irreversible transfer remained, despite the anti-state reforms of the 1980s facilitated by New Right ideology. The introduction of state provision for health, education, and social security displaced much private market and voluntary sector provision.
The universal welfare state is often claimed by social democrats as the embodiment of their ideological support for social justice, contrasting with Middle Way policies, which only provided limited state welfare. However, in twentieth-century Britain, social democracy only achieved major political influence between 1945 and 1951.
Find out more about neoliberal approaches to welfare.
Is the Welfare State an Irreversible Social Fact?
Therborn (1986) argues that, once achieved, the welfare state becomes an irreversible feature of any modern democratic society. He suggests this is due to its functionality for the economy and its guarantee of electoral popularity—or rather, the popularity of those political parties that support it.
Research from Taylor-Gooby (1991) and more recent electoral trends demonstrate that support for state welfare remained high even during periods of right-wing Conservative government.
The Third Way and New Labour’s Shift
Towards the end of the twentieth century, the popularity of social democracy and its approach to welfare began to be questioned within the Labour Party. This shift resulted from:
- The electoral successes of Conservative governments in the 1980s and 1990s.
- A review of the role of state welfare within social democracy.
Following Labour’s 1992 election defeat, John Smith established a Commission on Social Justice (Borrie, 1994) to analyze policy directions. The report categorized perspectives into three groups:
- Deregulators – Advocated neoliberal policies and private markets.
- Levellers – Supported old-style social democratic justice through redistribution.
- Investors – Advocated social justice through economic growth and investment.
The third group became central to New Labour’s “Third Way” rhetoric, with policy shifts emphasizing individual and community responsibility over traditional state dependency (Powell, 1999; 2002; 2008).
Find out more about New Labour’s Third Way approach to welfare.
Conclusion: The Future of Social Democracy
As Page (2007) and Fitzpatrick (2003) argue, contemporary social democracy has shifted towards pragmatism, where welfare is framed as a form of social responsibility rather than an entitlement.
Sources and further reading
Alcock and Gregory (2022) Social Policy in Britain, Fifth Edition.
You might also like to explore the following:
Attlee, C. R. (1945–1951). Labour Government Post-War Welfare State Reforms.
Blair, Tony (1997–2010). New Labour Governments and Third Way Policies.
Borrie, Gordon (1994). Report of the Commission on Social Justice.
Crosland, Anthony (1956). The Future of Socialism.
George, V., & Wilding, P. (1994). Welfare and Ideology.
Le Grand, Julian (1982). The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services.
Page, Robert (2007). Revisiting the Welfare State.
Pierson, Christopher (1988). Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare.
Powell, Martin (1999, 2002, 2008). Evaluations of New Labour’s Social Policies.
Smith, John (1992). Labour Party Leadership and the Commission on Social Justice.
Tawney, R. H. (1931). Equality.
Taylor-Gooby, Peter (1991). Public Opinion, Ideology, and State Welfare.
Therborn, Göran, & Roebroek, Joop (1986). The Irreversibility of the Welfare State.
To return to the homepage – revisesociology.com
Leave a Reply