Religion and Social Change
Functionalists and Marxists argue religion prevents change, Max Weber and others disagree!
Functionalists and Marxists argue religion prevents change, Max Weber and others disagree!
According to Functionalism, religion acts as a conservative force by reinforcing social norms and promoting social solidarity. This post is A summary of the key ideas of the main Functionalist theorists of religion: Durkheim, Parsons and Malinowski.
A summary of Talcott Parson’s functionalist perspective on religion
A summary of Bonislow Mainowski’s perspective on religion.
In his work “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life”, sociologist Durkheim proposed a theory of religion based on the sacred, which transcends ordinary life, and the profane, referring to mundane routines. He saw religion as a mechanism to distinguish between these and argued that religious rituals reinforce social bonds and collective conscience. Moreover, Durkheim identified totemic religion, found among Aboriginal societies, as the simplest religious practice. Noting that worship of the totem signifies respect for society, he argued that societies, in essence, worship themselves through religion. Criticisms of his theory include lack of generalizability and less relevance to complex societies.
An example of a top band answer (17/20) to a possible question on the AQA’s 7192/2 topics in sociology paper (families option, section A)
This is an example of a 25/30 answer to the above question, as marked by the AQA. In the pictures
Just a few thoughts on how you might apply Functionalism and Marxism to the Royal Wedding! Functionalists might interpret the
Functionalism Main post on the functionalist perspective on education. Education teaches us specialist skills for work – At school, individuals
Essay practice for A-level sociology!